Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
This case presents an important question under the Natural Gas Act.1 This question, central to the case, is: When a company, proposing to make, under contract, jurisdictional sales2 of natural gas in interstate commerce, *139applies for a certificate of public convenience and necessity as required by the Act, and requests that the certificate be limited in time to the duration of a contract for the sale of gas which it has entered, does the Federal Power Commission have the authority to tender it, instead, a certificate without time limitation?
Petitioner, Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company, an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- City of Chicago, Illinois v. Federal Power Commission, Pipeline Production Group, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.