Legal Opinion
Richland County v. Carolina Chloride, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 28, 2009No. 4462PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIEPER, J.:
Carolina Chloride, Inc. appeals a directed verdict involving the zoning of real property in Richland County. We now withdraw our previous opinion from publication and substitute this revised opinion. 1 We affirm as modified in part, and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
In November of 1996, Carolina Chloride purchased 7.67 acres of land in Richland County from IBM for $85,000. Prior to the purchase, Carolina Chloride’s realtor contacted the Richland County Planning and Zoning Department (“County”) to inquire about the zoning of the IBM property. Carolina Chloride required M-2 zoning…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- United States v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carolina Chloride, Inc. v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Thompson v. Pruitt Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Equivest Fin., LLC v. RavenelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Gibson v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013