Legal Opinion
Katunich v. Donovan
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 30, 1984No. Court 81-9-01158PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, on behalf of the former employees at the Monroeville Research Laboratory of U.S. Steel, filed a petition with the Secretary of Labor on August 13, 1980, for certification of eligibility for trade adjustment assistance benefits. Upon the denial of certification, plaintiffs, acting pro se, brought this action to challenge the Secretary’s final negative determination.
This case is before the court for the fourth time. After its second remand, in Katunich v. Donovan, 8 CIT —, 594 F.Supp. 744 (1984) (Katunich III), the Secretary of Labor, on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hazel Paden v. U. S. Department of Labor and the Secretary of the Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Public Interest Research Group and Environmental Law Institute v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Katunich v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Daido Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Former Workers, United Mine Workers Local 7925 v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989