Legal Opinion
Katunich v. Donovan
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 6, 1984No. Court 81-9-01158PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
In this action, plaintiffs, on behalf of the former employees of U.S. Steel’s Monroe-ville, Pennsylvania, research laboratory, (Monroeville laboratory), challenge the denial of certification' of eligibility for trade adjustment assistance benefits made by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974. 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1982). The Secretary found that the former employees of the Monroeville laboratory were employed by a firm that did not produce an article “like or directly competitive” with an article which was adversely affected by increased imports. Hence,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Local 167, International Molders & Allied Workers' Union ex rel. Group of Aggrieved Workers v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- W. J. Usery, Jr., Secretary of Labor v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- American Permac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- United Steelworkers of America v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Former Employees of Westmoreland Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Katunich v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.