Legal Opinion
Malama Makua v. Rumsfeld
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided March 1, 2001No. CIV. 00-00813 SOM-LEKPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Plaintiff Malama Makua (“Malama”) challenges the Supplemental Environmental Assessment for Routine Training at Makua Military Reservation and PFC Pili-laáu Range Complex (“SEA”) and Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSI”) issued by the United States Department of the Army (“Army”) on December 12, 2000. Malama alleges that the SEA and FONSI violate the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., in concluding that the Army’s proposed training activities at Makua Military Reservation…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Flintkote Co. v. General Accident Assurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Santillan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Ortiz v. Menu Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
- Benton County v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.