Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Menu Foods, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided November 13, 2007No. CV. 07-00323 DAE/LEKPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY AS MOOT
DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. After reviewing Defendants’ objections (Doc. # 24) and the response and reply thereto, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs Motion for Remand and Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Stay as Moot (Doc. #23). This Court hereby…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Guglielmino v. McKee Foods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keown v. Tudor InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona Incorporated v. Change Healthcare Practice Management Solutions IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Mobile County Board of Health v. SacklerDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.