Santillan v. Gonzales
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Maria Santillan, et al. represent a class of persons who have been or will be granted lawful permanent resident status by the Justice Department’s Executive Office of Immigration Review and to whom the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has failed to issue evidence of status as a lawful permanent resident. Following this court’s denial of defendants’ motion to dismiss, plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment that defendants’ failure to issue evidence of status violates the Administrative Procedure Act (hereinafter “APA”)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert Stanovsek v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Kuang v. U.S. Dep't of Def.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Borum v. Brentwood Village, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Jammeh v. HNN Associates LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Jane Does 1-10 v. University of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.