Legal Opinion

Albert H. Carter v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1984No. 83-2280PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument-

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

In the district court appellant sought to challenge a 1962 federal conviction for perjury rendered in the Middle District of Georgia, for which the sentence has been fully served, on the grounds it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. In Re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Darrell Wayne ConditCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Steffler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. David Richard Moon v. Lanson Newsome, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Van Sickle v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API