Legal Opinion

United States v. Darrell Wayne Condit

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1980No. 79-1879PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is a pro se appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, denying appellant Condit’s motion, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. Appellant, presently incarcerated in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Frank Robert Cordee Hahn v. John C. Burke, Warden, Wisconsin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  4. John Culberson Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Bartlett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Reink KamerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Fernando BustillosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Orville Leon PayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API