Legal Opinion
Robert Procup v. C. Strickland
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 2, 1986No. 83-3430PublishedCited by 399 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED
2Per curiam
We took this case en banc to consider the propriety of an injunction restricting Robert Procup, a Florida prisoner, from filing any case with the district court unless submitted by an attorney admitted to practice before the court. Procup v. Strickland, 567 F.Supp. 146 (M.D.Fla. 1983), rev’d, 760 F.2d 1107 (11th Cir.1985), vacated, 760 F.2d 1116 (11th Cir.1985). The proceedings that brought the issue before this Court are set forth fully in those opinions.1 We hold that the district court’s injunction was overbroad, but that the district court has authority to impose serious…
3Cases cited32 opinions
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Lonzy Oliver. Appeal of Lonzy OliverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Warden, U.S. PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- In Re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- William S. Sires, Jr. v. Harold GabrielCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by399 opinions
- David Richard Moon v. Lanson Newsome, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Miller v. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Debro S. Abdul-Akbar v. Roderick R. MckelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
394 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.