Legal Opinion

People v. Averill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1914No. Docket No. 140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from the superior court of Grand Rapids; Stuart, J. Edward Averill was convicted of violating the liquor law.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The respondent was charged in the information filed against him in the superior court of Grand Rapids with having, on the 29th day of November, 1912, at the city of Grand Rapids, county of Kent, then and there unlawfully sold, furnished, and given—

“To one Harold Williams, a minor under the age of 21 years, to wit, of the age of 16 years, a beverage, a large quantity, to wit, two bottles of brewed, malt, fermented, vinous, and intoxicating liquor, namely lager beer, contrary to Act No. 160 of the Public Acts of the State of Michigan for the year 1909, and contrary to the statute in such case…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Faulks v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. People v. LongwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bailey v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DownesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. LumleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Shaffner v. City of RiverviewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. HughesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API