Legal Opinion

People v. Damm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1914No. Docket No. 162PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Lawrence Damm was convicted of a violation of the liquor law (2 Comp. Laws, § 5892, 2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 5068).

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Respondent, on November 17, 1913, was a retail liquor dealer in Ann Arbor. On that day three students in attendance at the university of Michigan were furnished by respondent’s barkeeper with intoxicating liquor, which one of them paid for and which they drank in respondent’s saloon. It is provided (2 Comp. Laws, §5392), that:

*556“It shall not be lawful for any person by himself, his clerk or agent, to permit any student in attendance at any public or private institution of learning in this State, or any minor, to play at cards, dice, billiards or any game of chance, in any part of any building,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Faulks v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. People v. LongwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bailey v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RaubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. State v. SchullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. AntkoviakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. RorvickIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API