Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Hughes

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 4, 1965No. File No. CR 1-15862; File No. CR 1-15863Published

1ConcurrenceJacobs, J.

The defendants in these cases were each charged with a violation of § 30-86 of the General Statutes, which is captioned as follows: “Sales to minors, intoxicated persons and drunkards.” The statute makes it unlawful for any permittee, his servant or agent, to sell or deliver alcoholic liquor to certain enumerated classes of protected persons, viz.: minors, intoxicated persons, habitual drunkards, those whose names appear on a list, prepared by the selectmen of a town, who are receiving town aid and are known to use alcoholic liquor, and certain persons whose relatives have requested that…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API