Legal Opinion

Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 10, 2008No. 05-1291 LPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

BLOCK, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case evokes the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims. In particular, it implicates the application of section 1500 of Title 28 of the U.S.Code (2008), which divests this court of that jurisdiction with regard to “any claim for or in respect to which the plaintiff ... has pending in any other court any suit ... against the United States____” Consequently, if a plaintiff is prosecuting a claim in another court when the plaintiff files the same claim in the Court of Federal Claims, the Court of Federal Claims may not…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mastrolia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Winnebago Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Low v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API