Legal Opinion
Low v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 7, 2009No. 09-532CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s October 5, 2009 motion to dismiss Plaintiffs August 13, 2009 complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and 28 U.S.C. § 1500. This case concerns a settlement agreement that Plaintiff Darlene W. Low and her employer, the Southwestern Power Administration of the Department of Energy (“DOE”), entered into *449in the year 2000. (Compl.H 2-5, 20.) Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the DOE agreed to create a new GS-14…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Halim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Palafox Street Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Kalick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.