Legal Opinion
Winnebago Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 25, 2011No. 06-913LPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
The Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska (“Tribe”), a federally recognized Indian tribe, alleges that the United States has not properly generated, invested, or managed its tribal trust assets. It initially filed suit in federal district court seeking an accounting and reconciliation of its trust funds and other equitable relief. Then, while the federal district court suit was pending, the Tribe filed suit in this court seeking money damages. In light of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) in United States v. Tohono O’odham Nation, -…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Resource Investments, Inc. and Land Recovery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.