Legal Opinion
Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 3, 2009No. C-00-20905 RMW, C-05-00334 RMW, C-06-00244 RMWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHASE III (CONDUCT TRIAL) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
This patent/antitrust litigation involves dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”) interface technology patented by Rambus and incorporated into industry-standard DRAMs. The litigation involves four actions. In the first action (Case No. 00-20905 or “Hynix /”), Hynix 1 (then Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries) sued Rambus for a declaratory judgment regarding various Rambus patents. The court divided the issues into three trial phases. The issue in the first phase concerned…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Stuart R. Meyers v. Asics Corp., and Asics Tiger Corp., and Hyde Athletics IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011