Legal Opinion

In Re Rhodes

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 6, 1936No. Patent Appeal 3538PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting appealed claims 14 to 17, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to an agricultural implement for marking the ground for irrigation purposes.

The marking plows are designed to be raised or lowered as desired by the operator, and they may be laterally adjusted, but such adjustment depends upon the lateral adjustment of the wheels of the implement.

Claim 14 is illustrative. It reads:

“14.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blackford v. WilderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. In re BrasharesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re LongCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  2. Application of Harry Louis Yale, Francis Alexander Sowinski and Jack BernsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. McElrath v. Industrial Rayon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. Application of John W. Hession, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. Application of David BandelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API