Legal Opinion
In re Brashares
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 28, 1935No. 3365PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner holding appellant to be estopped, because of non-compliance with Patent Office Rule 109, from making certain claims inserted in his application for the purpose of bringing about an interference proceeding between it and a patent No. 1,854,602 issued April 19,1932, to Charles W. Prescott, assignor to General Railway Signal Company (hereinafter referred to as the General Company) upon an appli-. cation filed April 16, 1925.
*874The application of appellant was filed March…
2Cited by8 opinions
- International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Daniels v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- In Re RhodesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- General Motors Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.