Legal Opinion
Blackford v. Wilder
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 1907No. 398PublishedCited by 26 opinions
HeaeiNG on au appeal from a decisioB of the CommissioBer of Pateats íb aB iaterfereBce case. The facts are suificieatlj stated íb the opiaioa.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shepard
delivered the opiaioa of the Court:
This is the secoud iuterfereuce betweeu the same parties [At-well J. Blackford aad William H. Wilder], declared ou the saaie applicatioa.
*537The issue of tbe first was defined in four counts as follows:
“1. In a burner tbe combination with a trough and perforated tubes situated thereabove and forming a combustion chamber, said trough having at its bottom a liquid-containing portion, and an enlarged upper vapor-receiving space, and a vertically disposed lighting member seated in the liquid-containing portion and extending upward between the Avails of the enlarged…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Nesbit v. Riverside Independent DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by26 opinions
- Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Daniels v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Application of PruttonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.