Legal Opinion
Employees Committed for Justice v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 29, 2005No. 6:04-cr-06098PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Preliminary Statement
Currently before the Court is defendant Eastman Kodak Company’s (hereinafter Kodak or defendant) motion to dismiss portions of the complaint filed by plaintiffs. (Docket # 83). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of this Court for all further proceedings.
Procedural Background
On November 12, 2003, plaintiff Courtney Davis filed a pro se complaint against Kodak in the Northern District of California alleging race discrimination. On March 10, 2004, the district court in…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Hill v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Jennifer Durand v. The Hanover Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Wright v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Adorno v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.