Legal Opinion
Adorno v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2009No. 06 Civ. 593(DC)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this case, a group of Hispanic employees sue the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the “Port Authority”) alleging discrimination on the basis of national origin, race, and ethnicity in the Port Authority’s appointments and promotions practices. Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs move for sanctions under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, alleging defendant spoli-ated evidence. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
BACKGRO…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Passlogix, Inc. v. 2FA TECHNOLOGY, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Adorno v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.