Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1913No. 991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29404 (T. D. 32751).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise involved in these protests is described by the Board of General Appraisers in its opinion as follows:

The articles here are machines for slicing meats. This slicing arrangement is a machine knife, as opposed to a hand knife, and in it the meat is cut by a disk-shaped revolving knife, either hand operated or fitted so as tó be power driven.

The report of the appraiser describes them as “Berkel’s patent hand-operated automatic meat-slicing machines,” with other apt words of description which are similar to those employed in the opinion of the board, and no question is made as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Engelsted v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API