Legal Opinion

Engelsted v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 26, 1947No. C. D. 1049PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

The question which confronts us here is whether certain so-called steel rings upon which duty was levied at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for—

Articles or wares not specially provided for, * * * composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, * * * or other metal * * *

are properly dutiable at the rate of 27% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353 of said act, as modified by the provisions in the trade *88agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom, effective January 1, 1939 (74 Treas. Dec.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API