Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 22, 1911No. 724PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Board of Unitecl States General Appraisers, Abstract 26164 (T. D. 31774).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case consists of steel hair clippers used by barbers in cutting hair. These instruments are so generally and familiarly known as to require no description here. They were classified by the collector as manufactures of steel not specially provided for and were assessed with'duty at 45 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 199 of the tariff act of 1909.

The importers duly filed their protest to this assessment and- contended that the articles were assessable either directly or by similitude as machine tools at the rate of 30 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 197…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Myers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. United States v. KnauthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Benecke v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API