Legal Opinion

Richter v. Neilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1936No. Civ. 9701PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The plaintiff, Ernest Richter, sued the defendant, Mrs. Irene A. Neilson, for malicious prosecution, and upon trial before the court sitting without a jury was given judgment for damages in the sum of $1150, from which judgment defendant appeals. The action grew out of plaintiff’s arrest on a grand theft charge filed against him on May 6, 1932, by the defendant after consultation with a deputy district attorney who drew the criminal complaint and authorized the issuance of the warrant of arrest. The specific charge made against plaintiff was that he unlawfully took $265 of the personal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Barron v. MasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Hanchey v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. City Products Corp. v. Globe Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. PhersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API