Legal Opinion
Conerly v. CVN Companies, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 21, 1992No. Civ. 4-89-214PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, the court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Defendant CVN TV Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of defendant CVN Companies, Inc. Defendants own and operate a home telemarketing service known as Cable Value Network (“CVN”). Plaintiff Darrell Conerly (“Conerly”), a black male, was employed by CVN as a telemarketing sales representative from December 14, 1986 until he was fired on May 22, 1987.
Conerly claims that…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Guillory-Wuerz v. BradyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Rowson v. County of Arlington, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Kovatovich v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Ribando v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.