Legal Opinion
Ordahl v. Forward Technology Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 4, 2004No. CIV.02-1014 JRT/FLNPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dennis Ordahl (“Ordahl”) was employed by defendant Forward Technology Industries, Inc. (“FTI”) as a machinist until his employment was terminated in August 2000. Ordahl claims that he was unlawfully terminated by FTI in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”) and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). FTI asserts that Ordahl is not disabled and was never regarded or treated as disabled as that term is defined in the ADA. FTI further argues that Or-dahl’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MAC ARTHUR KAMMUELLER, — v. LOOMIS, FARGO & CO., —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Alvin Emory v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Rhode Island Medical Society v. WhitehouseDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Johnson v. MithunDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Mudrich v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.