Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Yukon-Koyukuk School District

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2006No. S-11683PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

David Schmitz negotiated a contract with the Yukon-Koyukuk School District to teach at the Coldfoot School for the 2001-2002 school year. The contract gave him tenure and provided that if the district eliminated his position he would be assigned to the district's central office in Fairbanks. Although the contract contained no grievance provisions, it incorporated the terms of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the district and the teachers' union, which set out a three-step grievance process. The district terminated the Coldfoot…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Casey v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Neal & Co. v. Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BeardAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cozzen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Grant v. Anchorage Police DepartmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. City of Kotzebue v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API