Legal Opinion

City of Kotzebue v. State, Department of Corrections

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2007No. S-12149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

For a number of years, the City of Kotze-bue operated the Kotzebue Regional Jail under a contract with the state. After being rebuffed by the state in its efforts to increase funding under the contract, the city opted to let the contract expire and then sued the state to recover the cost of operating the jail and transporting prisoners to court for arraignment. The main issue here is whether the Alaska departments of corrections and public safety owed a continuing duty to house and transport prisoners held in the Kotzebue jail after the contract expired.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  5. Oceanview Homeowners Ass'n v. Quadrant Construction & EngineeringAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BourdonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  3. Edward Chinuhuk, Herman Malutin, and Christopher Wasili v. State of Alaska, Edward Chinuhuk, Herman Malutin, and Christopher Wasili v. State of Alaska, Edward Chinuhuk, Herman Malutin, and Christopher Wasili v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. BourdonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API