Legal Opinion

Grant v. Anchorage Police Department

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2001No. S-8844PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Carroll Grant was terminated from the Anchorage Police Department (APD) because physical deterioration from an accidentally self-inflicted gunshot wound to his hand prevented him from performing the physical duties of a police officer. Grant did not file a grievance of his termination after his union declined to do so on his behalf. He then applied for and received permanent occupational disability from the Anchorage Police and Fire Retirement Board. Grant later filed a wrongful termination suit against the APD. Although the superior court correctly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Native Village of Eyak v. GC ContractorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Casey v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Casey v. Semco Energy, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Smith v. StaffordAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ellison v. Plumbers & Steam Fitters Union Local 375Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Schmitz v. Yukon-Koyukuk School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Chris Keen v. Municipality of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API