Legal Opinion
Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. McNulty
California Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1963No. L. A. 27013PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Defendants in an eminent domain action appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict awarding them $12,900 for the taking of 2.62 acres by plaintiff district for the purpose of constructing a flood control channel. An additional sum of $5,000 awarded as severance damages was set off against an equal amount in special benefits found to accrue as a result of improvements made by the district.
Defendants owned 38.85 acres in the City of Santa Fe Springs which were zoned for industrial use but had not been developed for that purpose. The flood control channel, which was constructed prior to the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. ArthoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Ruth v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.