Legal Opinion
City of Garnett v. Smith
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 11, 1905No. 14,281PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from Anderson district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Per curiam
William Y. Smith recovered judgment against the city of Garnett for damage resulting to him from falling on a defective sidewalk. The petition stated:
“That ... a certain public highway and street, known and designated as Seventh avenue, was, at the time the plaintiff received the injuries herein complained of, and for a long time prior thereto . . . had been, a public highway and stréet; . . . that along the south side of said avenue, street, and highway, and along the north side of lot eleven (11), in block seventy-three (73), in said city of Garnett, there was at the time of the injury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Langan v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- City of Osage City v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Maultby v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- City of Wichita v. CoggshallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Taggart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Ade v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Clark v. City of South HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Dunfee v. City of IolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.