Legal Opinion

City of Garnett v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1905No. 14,281PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Anderson district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Per curiam

William Y. Smith recovered judgment against the city of Garnett for damage resulting to him from falling on a defective sidewalk. The petition stated:

“That ... a certain public highway and street, known and designated as Seventh avenue, was, at the time the plaintiff received the injuries herein complained of, and for a long time prior thereto . . . had been, a public highway and stréet; . . . that along the south side of said avenue, street, and highway, and along the north side of lot eleven (11), in block seventy-three (73), in said city of Garnett, there was at the time of the injury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Langan v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. City of Osage City v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Maultby v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. City of Wichita v. CoggshallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Taggart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Ade v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Clark v. City of South HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Dunfee v. City of IolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API