Legal Opinion

Dunfee v. City of Iola

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1914No. 18,775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust,. judge.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was seriously injured by a fall on a sidewalk. She alleged negligence against the city and recovered a small judgment, from which the city has appealed.

The defect in the sidewalk consisted in a gas stop box. which stood about an inch and a quarter above the surface of the walk. It had a cover or top projecting from it which caught the toe of plaintiff’s shoe and caused, her to fall. The petition stated a cause of action and was not subject to demurrer. The plaintiff testified that she had been over the walk a number of times and had seen the stop box, but had not paid particular…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Garnett v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. McCoy v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Smith v. City of RosedaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taggart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Blankenship v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Ade v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Gaitskill v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1955
  5. Wright v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API