Legal Opinion
People v. Barton
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 1, 2002No. Docket 234277PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal by defendant thas been remanded by our Supreme Court for consideration as on leave granted, People v Barton, 464 Mich 853 (2001), following her district court jury conviction of insulting conduct in a public place in violation of Manistee City Ordinance 662.01(B)(3). We reverse and remand.
Defendant was originally charged with disturbing the peace in violation of Manistee City Ordinance 662.01(B)(19) after she was overheard referring to fellow restaurant patrons as “spies.” The complaint was subsequently amended to charge defendant with a violation of Ordinance 662.01(B)(3), which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. ChowdhuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. DouglasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. RappMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.