Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2014No. Docket 146212PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZahra, J.

In People v Fobb, the Court of Appeals held that an extortion conviction under the “against his will” prong of MCL 750.213 may only be maintained when the act defendant sought to compel entailed “serious consequences” to the victim. This case requires us to revisit the Fobb decision. In the instant case, a jury convicted defendant of extortion after he maliciously threatened to injure a mechanic unless the mechanic resumed working on defendant’s truck in the rain. Defendant, relying on Fobb, maintains that he cannot be convicted of extortion because the act defendant sought to compel — the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Christopher Allan OrosMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. 2 Crooked Creek LLC v. Cass County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API