Legal Opinion

O'LAUGHLIN v. City of Fort Gibson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1964No. 40824, 40858PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

These cases concern the same subject matter and issues and have been consolidated by agreement for hearing in this court. We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiffs alleged in their petition that they all live on lands adjacent to or in close proximity to a rural lot upon which the city of Fort Gibson proposes to construct a “lagoon type” sewage disposal unit. They further alleged that the sewage disposal unit, if constructed, would constitute a nuisance to them, and would irreparably damage them and their property because of the foul and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Everett v. PaschallWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Ferry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Town of Rush Springs v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Priddy v. ShiresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Thomas v. HamptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. REVOLUTION RESOURCES v. ANNECYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Concorde Resources Corp. v. Williams Production Mid-Continent Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API