Legal Opinion

Town of Rush Springs v. Bentley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 1, 1919No. 10090PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County: Will Linn, Judge. Action for injunction by J. M. Bentley and others against the Town of Rush Springs, Okla., and its officers, and the N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron Works. Judgment for plaintiffs granting a permanent injunction, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

McNElLL. J.

This is an appeal from a permanent injunction granted to J. M. Bentley et al., against the town of Rush Springs, Okla., and its officers, and N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron Works, wherein the court enjoined the defendants from constructing on block 91, in the town of Rush Springs, a certain sewer basin and septic tank. From the order granting the injunction, the town of Rush Springs and different officers have appealed.

The facts in the ease, as gathered from thá record, are: The town of Rush Springs had drawn certain plans and specifications and had entered into a contract with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Clinton Cemetery Ass'n v. McAtteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Bixby v. CravensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Kenyon v. Edmundson, Adm'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Weaver v. DrakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API