Legal Opinion
Driscoll v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.
Plaintiffs, individually and doing business as a co-partnersMp for the practice of law, sue for (1) damages *378in the sum of $100,000; (2) counsel fees; and (3) injunctive relief: in connection -with defendants alleged failure to provide proper telephone service. The first cause of action for damages in the .sum of $100,000, alleges gross negligence, willful misconduct and failure to render “minimal” phone .service. The second cause pleads the violation of subdivisions 1 and 3 of ■section 91 of the Public Service Law, resulting in plaintiffs’ damage in the sum of $100,000. The third cause is for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamilton Employment Service, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Earl Carroll Realty Corp. v. New York Edison Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
- Meyerson v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mobile America Corp., Inc. v. Southern Bell T. & T. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Warren v. New York Telephone Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972