Legal Opinion

Emery v. Rochester Telephone Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The plaintiff claims that the defendant negligently failed to furnish him adequate telephone service and that as a result thereof the services of a physician could not be secured until too late to save the life of plaintiff’s intestate.

The defendant in a separate defense claims that it is exempted from liability by reason of a provision in its contract. This defense the plaintiff seeks to strike out.

A telephone corporation is required to “ furnish and provide with respect to its business such instrumentalities and facilities as shall be adequate and in all respects just and reasonable.” (Pub.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. F. A. Straus & Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Colton v. New York HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. CCT Communications, Inc. (In Re CCT Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Kaiser Alum. & Chem. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API