Legal Opinion

Walton v. Jaskiewicz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 11, 1989No. 133, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The question presented is whether a majority of property owners in a residential subdivision may amend a Declaration of Covenants to exempt one lot from a restriction against further subdivision or whether the amendment is invalid because it does not apply uniformly to all lots burdened by the restrictive covenants.

I

The parties in this case are lot owners and residents of the Brock Hall subdivision, located in the Marlboro District of Prince George’s County. Plats 1 and 2 of the subdivision consist of forty-five “estate lots” ranging in size from three to seven acres each,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Matthews v. Kernewood, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Zent v. MurrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Bartell v. SengerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Steve Vogli & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arthur M. Deck & Associates v. Crispin, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Teal Trading & Development, LP v. Champee Springs Ranches Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Licker v. HarkleroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. RDC Melanie Dr. v. EppardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Maatta v. Dead River Campers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API