Legal Opinion

RDC Melanie Dr. v. Eppard

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 15, 2021No. 48/20PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RDC Melanie Drive, LLC v. Mark R. Eppard, et al., No. 48, September Term 2020. Opinion by Hotten, J. CIVIL PROCEDURE – RES JUDICATA – COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL The Court of Appeals held that the issue of whether restrictive covenants prohibited a commercial golf driving range on any lot within a residential subdivision was neither barred by res judicata nor collateral estoppel. Res judicata did not apply because the issues litigated in a previous matter and the current matter were distinct. The former concerned a zoning variance and the latter concerned the application of a restrictive covenant.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. MPC, Inc. v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Sanders v. Bd. of Education, Harford Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Howard R. & D. Corp. v. IMH ColumbiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. Moore v. CVS PharmacyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API