RDC Melanie Dr. v. Eppard
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RDC Melanie Drive, LLC v. Mark R. Eppard, et al., No. 48, September Term 2020. Opinion by Hotten, J. CIVIL PROCEDURE – RES JUDICATA – COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL The Court of Appeals held that the issue of whether restrictive covenants prohibited a commercial golf driving range on any lot within a residential subdivision was neither barred by res judicata nor collateral estoppel. Res judicata did not apply because the issues litigated in a previous matter and the current matter were distinct. The former concerned a zoning variance and the latter concerned the application of a restrictive covenant.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- MPC, Inc. v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Sanders v. Bd. of Education, Harford Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Frankel v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Howard R. & D. Corp. v. IMH ColumbiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Moore v. CVS PharmacyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026