Legal Opinion

Maatta v. Dead River Campers, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2004No. Docket 248848PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case of first impression, plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint and dissolving a temporary injunction against defendant. Plaintiffs, who sought a permanent injunction preventing the use of a lot in the Dead River Basin development as a public access site, alleged that defendant’s use of the site violated a restrictive covenant limiting the use of lots in the development to “single-family residential purposes and incidental recreational uses,” and another forbidding activities that are offensive, annoying, or a nuisance. Because we find that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Valdes v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Zent v. MurrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Bartell v. SengerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Steve Vogli & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Teal Trading & Development, LP v. Champee Springs Ranches Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Cvitanovich-Dubie v. DubieHawaii Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API