Maatta v. Dead River Campers, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this case of first impression, plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint and dissolving a temporary injunction against defendant. Plaintiffs, who sought a permanent injunction preventing the use of a lot in the Dead River Basin development as a public access site, alleged that defendant’s use of the site violated a restrictive covenant limiting the use of lots in the development to “single-family residential purposes and incidental recreational uses,” and another forbidding activities that are offensive, annoying, or a nuisance. Because we find that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Valdes v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Zent v. MurrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Bartell v. SengerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Steve Vogli & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Teal Trading & Development, LP v. Champee Springs Ranches Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Cvitanovich-Dubie v. DubieHawaii Supreme Court · 2011