Love v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant pled nolo contendere to one count of conspiracy to commit grand larceny, a gross misdemeanor. On appeal, he contends that his plea is constitutionally infirm because the record does not adequately show it was knowingly and voluntarily entered. We agree and reverse.
In order to be constitutionally valid, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere must have been knowingly and voluntarily entered. Standen v. State, 99 Nev. 76, 657 P.2d 1159 (1983); Hanley v. State, 97 Nev. 130, 624 P.2d 1387 (1981). The record must reveal, inter alia, that the accused entered…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Higby v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Hanley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Heffley v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Standen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Gonzales v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
4Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GomesNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Agtas v. WhitleyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
- Finger v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Finger v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Perkins (Shiloh) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015