Legal Opinion

Love v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1983No. 12836PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant pled nolo contendere to one count of conspiracy to commit grand larceny, a gross misdemeanor. On appeal, he contends that his plea is constitutionally infirm because the record does not adequately show it was knowingly and voluntarily entered. We agree and reverse.

In order to be constitutionally valid, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere must have been knowingly and voluntarily entered. Standen v. State, 99 Nev. 76, 657 P.2d 1159 (1983); Hanley v. State, 97 Nev. 130, 624 P.2d 1387 (1981). The record must reveal, inter alia, that the accused entered…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Higby v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hanley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Heffley v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Standen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Gonzales v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GomesNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Agtas v. WhitleyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
  3. Finger v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Finger v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Perkins (Shiloh) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API