Finger v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Leavitt, L,
concurring:
I agree with the majority that the requirement of a mentally ill defendant to plead guilty but mentally ill deprives a defendant of liberty without due process of law and is in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The attempt by the Legislature to wipe away more than a century of criminal jurisprudence tramples on the due process rights of mentally unsound defendants and is unconstitutional.
*579The new procedure conflicts with several Nevada statutes.
The criminal justice system does not punish persons unable to form the intent necessary to commit a crime. Under current…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Higby v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- United States v. Artemio Gomez-CuevasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.