Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Finger v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2001No. 32716Published

1Concurrence

Leavitt, L,

concurring:

I agree with the majority that the requirement of a mentally ill defendant to plead guilty but mentally ill deprives a defendant of liberty without due process of law and is in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The attempt by the Legislature to wipe away more than a century of criminal jurisprudence tramples on the due process rights of mentally unsound defendants and is unconstitutional.

*579The new procedure conflicts with several Nevada statutes.

The criminal justice system does not punish persons unable to form the intent necessary to commit a crime. Under current…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Higby v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. United States v. Artemio Gomez-CuevasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API