Legal Opinion

State v. Gomes

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. 27163PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The district court granted post-conviction habeas relief to respondent Donald Fred Gomes and set aside his guilty plea and judgment of conviction. The court found that Gomes had intended to enter a plea of nolo contendere but that a plea pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), was entered instead. The court concluded that the plea was therefore not voluntary and knowing and should be set aside.

We hold that a plea entered pursuant to Alford is a plea of nolo contendere and reverse.

FACTS

On January 20, 1993, Gomes signed a plea bargain agreement in which he pleaded…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bryant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hutchins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Milligan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gaxiola v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Aberha v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  4. BURNSIDE (TIMOTHY) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY/DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. BURNSIDE (TIMOTHY) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY/DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API