Legal Opinion

Higby v. Sheriff of Clark County

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1970No. 6328PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, L:

This appeal is centered about our interpretation of the mandatory language set forth in subsection 1 of NRS 174.035, which was adopted by the Legislature in 1967. The statute prescribes the procedure that the judges of our State shall follow when accepting a defendant’s guilty plea or a plea of nolo contendere. It provides as follows:

“1. A defendant may plead not guilty, guilty or, with the consent of the court, nolo contendere. The court may refuse to accept a plea of guilty, and shall not accept such plea or a plea of nolo contendere without first addressing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bryant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. LeBlanc v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API