Velsicol Corp. v. Hyman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentNiemeyer, J.
A statement of certain uncontested facts is necessary to an understanding of the issues presented on the appeal.
Defendant, a chemist, with degrees from the University of Chicago and the University of Leipzig, returned to Chicago in 1924; before his connection with plaintiff he was employed by the International Filter Company as a research chemist, by the Transo Envelope Company (hereafter called Transo), organizing and equipping a laboratory, and by the Pure Oil Company as a research chemist; with each of these companies he signed a patent assignment agreement. In November 1930, after leaving…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wireless Specialty Apparatus Co. v. Mica Condenser Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- People v. DummerIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Moreen v. Estate of CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Tepper v. CampoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.