Legal Opinion · Dissent

Velsicol Corp. v. Hyman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 20, 1949No. Gen. No. 44,593Published

1DissentNiemeyer, J.

A statement of certain uncontested facts is necessary to an understanding of the issues presented on the appeal.

Defendant, a chemist, with degrees from the University of Chicago and the University of Leipzig, returned to Chicago in 1924; before his connection with plaintiff he was employed by the International Filter Company as a research chemist, by the Transo Envelope Company (hereafter called Transo), organizing and equipping a laboratory, and by the Pure Oil Company as a research chemist; with each of these companies he signed a patent assignment agreement. In November 1930, after leaving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Wireless Specialty Apparatus Co. v. Mica Condenser Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. People v. DummerIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Moreen v. Estate of CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Tepper v. CampoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API