Gragg v. Orange Cab Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on “Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. # 69) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff, who represents himself and similarly situated persons, received a text message from defendants which he alleges violates the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227, and the Washington Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA).1 RCW §§ 19.190.010-110. Defendants assert that summary judgment is appropriate as they did not utilize an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- King v. Time Warner Cable Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Herrick v. GoDaddy.com LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Mey v. Venture Data, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2017
- Izsak v. Draftkings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Sherman v. Yahoo! Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.