Legal Opinion
Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2009No. 07-16356PublishedCited by 243 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Laci Satterfield, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Simon & Schuster, Inc. and ipshlnet Inc. (“ipsh!”). 1 Satterfield alleges a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, arising after Satterfield received an unsolicited text message. We hold that there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether the equipment used by Simon & Schuster has the capacity to both (1) store or produce numbers to be called using a random or sequential…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- John Daubert v. NRA Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- James Steinle v. City and County of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.